Reducing the Energy Consumption of Affordable Housing in Shanghai – MSc Dissertation Results 怎么减少上海老住宅的能量用量 – 硕士论文的结果
I recently finished my dissertation
and therefore completed my MSc in Sustainability and Adaptation in the Built
Environment – hooray! This is why I didn’t update this blog for a long time
while I concentrated on my studies, but I aim to get it going again now. So
this post kick-starts the blog again with a summary of my dissertation:
The dissertation research investigated
the most sustainable, locally available materials for use in retrofitting the
building envelope (outside of the building) of ‘affordable housing’ in Shanghai.
It tested whether the sustainable materials could compete with conventional
retrofitting materials in passively reducing energy consumption for heating and
cooling. This is an important area for research because 36-40%
of total energy consumption in China is attributable to buildings and no other
studies have focused on using sustainable materials for renovation in Shanghai or the surrounding region.
‘Affordable
housing’ refers to typical 5-8 storey residential buildings built in very
large numbers across China in the 1970s-1990s. Existing affordable housing in
Shanghai is mostly uninsulated and built to poor
standards for energy efficiency. Its residents generally rely on
air-conditioning for both cooling and heating, contributing significantly to
the rapidly growing
CO2 emissions of Shanghai’s residential sector, 57% of which are
attributable to electricity use.
3 examples of
affordable housing in Shanghai.
A 3D digital base model of a typical
example of affordable housing was developed in Sketchup Pro 2017 and OpenStudio
2.7.0. EnergyPlus 9.0.1 was used to run simulations of the energy consumption
of the model for heating and cooling with different retrofit options in order to
find the most effective options.
The unconventional/sustainable
materials tested were external insulation made of recycled PET (i.e. recycled
plastic bottles) with a lime-cement render, recycled cotton/denim or hemp fibre
external insulation with bamboo cladding in a rainscreen system, timber-framed
windows and timber external doors. An optimised bamboo window shading system was also developed. The conventional materials tested were
polyurethane, expanded polystyrene (EPS) and mineral wool external insulation
with a cement mortar, uPVC and aluminium-framed windows and uPVC and steel
external doors. There are cases where conventional materials have been used to
retrofit affordable housing in China, providing hope that more of these
buildings could be renovated in the future.
Screenshot of the base
model of affordable housing.
An example of
retrofitted affordable housing in the city of Jinan in Shandong Province,
using expanded polystyrene (EPS) as external insulation.
Modelling indicated that the best
unconventional/sustainable materials (recycled PET insulation with a
lime-cement mortar, timber-framed triple-glazed windows and timber external
doors) could reduce annual energy use for heating and cooling by 74% in the
present day. This is a comparable performance to the best conventional
materials (polyurethane insulation with a cement mortar, uPVC-framed
triple-glazed windows and uPVC external doors) which could induce energy
savings of 75%. As Shanghai steadily warms under projections of future climate
change, by 2080 both sets of materials would still result in energy savings of
two thirds compared to the base model – that’s supposing
these buildings are still standing by then!
Comparison of electricity consumption for heating and
cooling in the present day before and after retrofitting (with CSWD weather data). Key:
BM1: base model 1; BM2: base model 2 (with improved airtightness); USRM1: unconventional,
sustainable retrofits model 1 (including improved airtightness); CRM1:
conventional retrofits model 1 (including improved airtightness).
Comparison of total annual electricity consumption for heating and
cooling between the present day and under future projections of climate change
(with SWERA
weather data). Key: BM1: base model 1; USRM2: unconventional, sustainable
retrofits model 2; CRM2: conventional retrofits model 2.
The unconventional/sustainable
materials have a lower environmental impact and require much less energy during
their production processes than the best conventional materials. For example,
using recycled PET would turn China’s growing plastic
waste problems into an opportunity to reduce the energy consumption of
buildings. Or using timber/bamboo/hemp renovation products would result in
carbon being sequestered into the buildings, potentially making the renovations
carbon negative.
Therefore the implications of this
study are that subsidy policy in Shanghai and the surrounding region should
focus on supporting the establishment and growth in use of sustainable
materials to retrofit the existing affordable housing stock. This would sustainably
reduce its energy use for heating and cooling in the present day and in the
future under the influence of climate change.
A comparison of the
energy used to produce 1m3 of each window frame material.
If you would like to read the full
dissertation then please do not hesitate to email me at mikejoyce1988@gmail.com to request a
PDF copy. Any comments, critique or feedback would be very welcome.
Thank you to all the staff and my
classmates at the Centre for Alternative Technology (Wales) for the incredible
experience I had while completing this masters degree. I wish you all well and
please stay in touch! J






Comments
Post a Comment