As I looked
out of my office window a month ago I noticed something that shouldn’t have
been there – a plume of polluted air coming out of the chimney of the nearest
district heating plant. South China doesn’t have any district heating systems
as it is deemed to be warm enough not to need it, even though temperatures in
many parts of the south are around 10oC or lower in winter. On the
other hand, in North China we have been blessed by government-controlled
coal-fired district heating systems.
For anyone who’s not familiar with
‘district heating’, there is a central heating plant in each district in the
city, which, in the case of North China, burns a large amount of coal to heat a
large amount of water which is then pumped around the local district in pipes,
into the blocks of flats and round people’s radiators. In China, individuals
have no control over their heating system. The system is owned by a state-owned
enterprise, which, in Tianjin anyway, switches it on in mid-November and then
switches it off in mid-March. The plume of smoke should not have been there
because it was near the end of March. We had been gifted with two extra
weeks of warmth in our homes and workplaces! Brilliant! Or so it seems…
In theory, district heating is much more
efficient than everyone having their own boiler. Also, heating high-rise
buildings is more efficient than heating lots of individual houses, because
each flat or office may only have one or two external walls to lose heat from,
instead heat passes through the walls, floors and ceilings into other rooms in
the building, reducing the need for any individual room to turn up its heating.
However, it doesn’t really work that well in Tianjin.
If you look at the picture above, on the left, you can see part of the problem – an open window. Why would the windows be open? Because no-one has a thermostat, so no-one has control over the temperature of their flat or office, the heat just keeps getting pumped in from the pipes. Generally most of them are being heated much more than necessary, so when we were gifted with an extra two weeks of heating at the end of March during fairly warm weather, people let the excess heat out. In the background of the picture you can see the chimney I can see from my office; in order to power the system coal is burned and hundreds of chimneys like this one, all around the city, pump pollution into the air as a result. Notice the effect of this in the colour of the sky too, or lack of it as the case may be. So people are opening their windows to let the heat out, and as the heat goes out the pollution that was emitted to produce that heat comes in… Personally, rather than choosing between overheating or damaging my lungs, I’d rather they switched the heating off in mid-March as normal and then I’d perform the classic trick of putting on an extra layer of clothing for a few weeks.
The picture on the right shows the
pipes for the heating system running through the neighbourhood where I live.
There is a problem with these too – they’re suspended in the air. Efficient
district heating systems should have their pipes laid underground for
insulation, but these pipes will be leaking heat as they transport the hot
water around. They are insulated, but it is quite common to see patches where
the insulation has worn away. All this means more coal has to be burned to keep
the temperature of the water high enough.
On top of all this, nobody has much
of an incentive to insulate their homes or offices. In addition to not being
able to control the internal temperature, the reason is that we also pay a
fixed heating bill for the whole winter based on the amount of floor-space we
have – so why bother with insulation? In the summer people would benefit from not needing to
use the air-conditioning quite so much if their buildings were better insulated,
but half the incentive has gone because of the lack of control over the heating
system in the winter.
The heating systems are
finally switched off in Spring, the weather turns warm, and then very hot, the leaves come out, and people start to
turn on their air-conditioning. It can be almost quite romantic to wonder down
a leafy avenue on a hot summer night listening to the ‘drip drip drip drip
drip’ of hundreds of air-conditioning units in every direction dripping onto
the tin roofs of the balconies below. But when you consider the huge amount of
energy required to power them and the consequent CO2 emissions and
pollution being pumped out of the coal-fired power plants it’s enough to spoil
the romance in an instant. The amount of power going into air-conditioning
could be reduced if people had a bigger incentive to insulate their flats, but
instead the more CO2 released as a result the more the climate heats
up and the more people use their air-conditioning…
But there is some reason for
optimism. In my first blog post I mentioned the meeting about fossil fuel subsidy reform in China that I was on my way to attend in Beijing. At the
meeting I learned that one of the subsidies they want to phase out is subsidies
for the district heating state-owned enterprises. The government has been
subsidising them to ensure that people have affordable heating. However,
people’s heating bills are fixed, and not pegged to the price of coal. The
price of coal has been steadily falling since 2011, and as buying coal accounts
for 60% of the costs of the heating companies, this means that their profits
are increasing as they continue to receive the same amount of money from
bill-payers and government subsidies. The government plans to stop this, and
peg heating bills to the price of coal, while making the heating companies
disclose their expenditure more transparently in order to prevent them from
using their monopoly over the heating system to profiteer from bill-payers.
This should encourage them to use coal more efficiently, and will free up
government money to spend elsewhere. Perhaps, if heating bills are no longer
fixed, the public will have reason to demand more energy efficiency in the
heating system and in buildings to reduce their heating bills? We’ll see,
things happen fast here.
Anyway, since I came back to China 6
weeks ago, regardless of everything said above, the number of blue-sky days has
been really high compared to how I remember it. Apparently, because I turned up
in March, I just missed the worst winter for pollution in the last decade… But since
I arrived I haven’t felt the need to wear a smog mask or keep my windows firmly
shut, it’s been really pleasant here, as you can see in the pictures below. The
prime minister of China, Li Keqiang, recently promised
more and more blue-sky days every year. Let’s hope they deliver this promise,
I feel optimistic that they will, but then I wasn’t here for the worst winter
in a decade…




Hi, it is Roland, saw ur moments and I read this article, I'd like to give you my point of view whether it is useful or not.
ReplyDeleteBurning coal in the winter for providing heat, it is something people regard it as a basic need nowadays in the North of China. Also, with the trend that southern part of China, as you have mentioned also cold as well in Winter. 'heating for the whole country' also is on the list of Chinese government. This is a dilemma since the large scale of spread will cause the increase of carbon dioxide emission obviously..make the air pollution worse. But you can not really agianst people's willingness especially the living standard of China has been increased rapdily.
I have my personal experience studying for my high school alone in the southern China for 3 years. The apartment I live is like a igloo in winter. If the government will actully carry on this policy by using solar power or mixture of solar and Burning coal it will be great for people in the South depite the potential pollution.
Also, you said the heating that provided till March is wasteful.I agree. But from what I have known, in Beijing where the community I live has the term that you can associate with the committee that you decided to stop the heating system with the premise that you do not bother others. So, that was flexible for me instead of fixed proce.The charing also apply the stepped way.
For me, changing this Current situation is not easy at all.Most Chiness People wanna have a better life and they won't care about the air pollution or something. How to let them change their attitude or awareness is the key for me.
Thanks Ro.
Hi Roland,
DeleteThanks for reading my blog and commenting, of course your point of view is useful :-)
I totally agree that it would be great if people in the south can get heating as well, even if it does mean carbon emissions rise. I've taken holidays down there in the winter and most of it is actually pretty cold, and many areas in the south are much more humid than the north which makes it feel even colder, they deserve warm homes as much as anyone else! It will be interesting to see what kinds of heating systems the government installs down there, they have an opportunity now to make the new systems as low carbon, low polluting and efficient as possible. And these days there are many options for incorporating renewable energy into heating systems, or at least gas which is nowhere near as polluting or carbon intensive as coal. If they can combine that with a focus on improving the energy efficiency of the buildings then it would be great, because right now people in the south don't have much reason at all to make their buildings less draughty and more insulated so work will need to be done on that to make sure the heat from their new heating systems actually stays in the building.
I didn't know that about the heating in Beijing, that people can choose to have it switched off. That's great, I'm sure many people would switch it off to save money in a warm spring! You are right though, changing the existing heating systems and improving the energy efficiency of buildings is not easy, it's hard to change pre-existing infrastructure, but I'm sure any progress on it would be welcomed by everybody.